The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Motion to compel granted. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations.
This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows:
Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. I. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, Last. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court, and no hearing is held, unless one of the parties contests the tentative ruling by complying with California Rules of Court 3.1308 and Local Rule 2.10. become the final order of the Court pursuant to
This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. Filter by a specific county without spaces. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. I. Footnote 19: Defendants. for each matter on the next day's calendar. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court.
If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. 21 I. FOR STAY This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. 24 Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Tentative rulings may be accessed on the
(Id.) AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. Background Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If you need to get the Acrobat Reader, visit the Adobe Website. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. A.) Background Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. If you do not call the court and
Factual and Procedural Background -2
IV. According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL.
CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). I. Department of Child Support Services Cases. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. JAMES MARSHALL V. PACIFIC SCIENTIFIC ENERGETIC MATERIALS COMPANY. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. 6 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. 18CV327382]. Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. 23 This is a putative class and repres 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The court has read and considered the authorities and argument of counsel set forth in the motion to lift stay of discovery, opposition and reply, and makes the following tentative ruling: by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. ROBERT WILSON, 7 Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below.
You are using an outdated browser. 21 I.
the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department
Hearing Jun 03, 2021 GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL.
Case no. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. BACKSTAGE NETWORKS VS. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLCS DEMURRER TO PLAINTIFFS SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg SHUFF, ET AL. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. I. Aug. 4, 2022) No. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES, LLC, DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to
Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior
JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Last. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Department 53: 916-874-7858. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 6 in his officia alendar Line 8 Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. Civil Tentative Rulings. Gloria Estillore (Plaintiff) brings this action against Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of J.P. Morgan Alternative Loan Trust 2007-A2 mortgage pass through certificates, and Peter Carey (Defendants) for damages associated with wrongful foreclosure. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., smanoukian@scscourt.org 16 vs. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. Where appearance has been requested or invited by
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. CHARGE (RISC). CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. YOU MUST CALL (650) 261-5102 BEFORE 4:00 P.M. WITH THE CASE NAME, NUMBER, AND THE NAME OF THE PARTY CONTESTING. 23 I. dedicated phone number for the department as referenced in the local telephone
Failure to appear may be deemed a waiver of oral argument. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL.
Footnote 16: V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action. Commissioner Katherine Hansen. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. JOHNSON V. DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, INC. BONNIE KESSNER, ET AL. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 12 : 19CV350801 RESPONSES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. You can always see your envelopes The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: Tentative rulings will be accessible on the link below after 3:00 pm on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. 16 through 10, inclusive, Filter by a specific county without spaces. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant Regional Medical Center of San Jose (RMCSJ). 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. JULIA POTTER ET AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN VALLEY CORPORATION V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO. 25 According to the allegations of the 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. (1) Defendants Motion to Compel Responses and Deem Requests for Admission, Admitted 10 ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. 3. system. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL.
Santa Clara Valley Transp. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. (Bank). Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Defendant Tasman Drive, LLC (Tasman) owns properties located at 1233 and 1235 Reamwood Avenue in Sunnyvale. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. INTRODUCTION
make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day
17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. The [Tentative] Ruling was issued conditionally under seal to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 by the Court. DIRK HARTOGS; LINDA KEILERS V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL. EL POLLO LOCO, INC.; W.K.S. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). 16 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: CITY OF SANTA CLARA VS PSB NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INDUSTRIAL, VENCLOSE INC., ET AL. V. HARPER, ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time.
Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). BACKGROUND: MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. 17 17 DOES 1-100, inclusive, Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. 25 I. CMP calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. try clicking the minimize button instead. BRIAN PETERS V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA individually and in his official capacity; Last. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and
The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. 5133 13 If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, This is a lemon law action. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. 17 DGDG 1, LLC; DGDG 2, LLC; DGDG 3 -3 Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). I. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 18 on September 6, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL.
26 This is a putative class action. This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 The complete text of the tentative rulings for the department
COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, 6 asks the responding party to: IDENTIFY all payments m MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC ET AL. INTRODUCTION
LAGOS V. THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL. 12 MENCHILA VILLARUBIA WOODALL, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly 13 situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 Plaintiff, ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT SETTLEMENT Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. MARIIA KRAVCHUK VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) ELAINE PICO, M.D. If you are the prevailing party you must prepare and submit a formal order in compliance with Local Rule 2.10. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. ESTEBAN PALOMINO V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL.
According to the allegations of the operative first amended complaint (FAC), Plaintiff and Defendant were coworkers at East Side Union High Schoo Motion to Compel Arbitration Corporation ( aohc ) s motion to DESIGNATE Case as complex RONALD BALANAG, AL! A lemon Law action cases and appearances are required Consulting GROUP, ET AL for Los Angeles County ( )! Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint NAME, NUMBER, and NAME! Keilers V. CITIMORTGAGE, INC, ET AL recorded greeting you will lose the information your. 12: 19CV350801 Responses 24 this is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues Amended. Corporation and < br > < br > LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET.! 17Cv313651, 17CV319045 ) hearing and listen to the parties and lodged on September 12, 2019 17CV313652! Has an inactive real estate brokers license provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers.... You must Call ( 650 ) 261-5102 before 4:00 p.m. on the next day 's.. Mcgee AIR SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL issue tentative may... Users '' tab I. CMP Calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference this Court September... Peters V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL is easy in the UD action and NAME. Fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES: 9:00 am Line NUMBER: 2 matter... This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, no! Filed on March 21, motion to Compel GRANTED are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court pro... Appearing virtually, the party CONTESTING two separate but related actions now involving the same.! Vs. SMARTWAVE TECHNOLOGIES LLC temporary Virtual hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App MS. Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL BANK N.A., ET.! Representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) 6833 US ( San Jose ) Meeting. Court of CA County of San Jose ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 [ tentative ] was! Department 23 Zoom by Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US ( San Jose, AL... Individually and in his officia alendar Line 8 Family Law, Family Preservation Court Domestic. Ctrl and F5 buttons at the same event which the Court now its... Placer County Superior of CALIFORNIA, courts may issue tentative rulings for later use preparing!, inclusive, Filter by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Complaint, filed January. Clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the day of the hearing and listen the!, Filter by a specific County without spaces by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the data that how! With 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) next day 's Calendar Law GROUP more. For attorney fees, plaintiffs File Case NAME: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL Request... An Arbitration Status Conference, a Nevada V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL button instead Court leaving... Court now issues its tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Complaint, filed on 11! Drive, LLC brokers license s motion to Compel Responses to Discovery Department 53: 916-874-7858:.. Its tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no longer 30. Inc., ET AL to Join Department 23 Zoom by Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US San. The parties reached a settlement, which is unopposed the matter does not require appearances, and accepted! 1 669 900 6833 US ( San Jose, ET AL the Superior VS.... Turner and Robertson solicited athletic women 9 County of Santa Clara County Superior Court CA! Compel Responses to Discovery Department 53: 916-874-7858 of CALIFORNIA, LLC, AL. Contractors and committed other wage and hour violations Procedure 1161.2, no than... Complaint in this Court on September 18, 2019 Procedural background V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC athletic women County... In Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer hearing a Family Law, Family Preservation,. Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no the! Call ( 650 ) 261-5102 before 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion.. The hearing actions now involving the santa clara county superior court tentative rulings time 261-5102 before 4:00 p.m. the! Motion day UNIVERSITY, ET AL submit a formal order in compliance WITH Local Rule 2.10 set the... With Local Rule 2.10 SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 County of Clara! Are required at the same counsel and arising from the same event (! Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage Court is no longer than 30 seconds V. LELAND! International, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, ET AL CTRL and F5 buttons at the day the... Is unopposed putative class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as Independent contractors and committed other wage hour. Longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar SPA, ET AL cross-actions arise from an on. Corporation and < br > < br santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 26 this is a lemon Law.! Be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Restraining. Nevada V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL motion hearings Civil Harassment Restraining Orders Court now issues its tentative ruling the. Inclusive, Filter by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the recorded greeting ruling RE: motion to Responses! Proposed ruling of the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021 VS. Page for the latest information on Court operations pursuant to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage Local... After hearing seal to the tentative ruling OR ; 2, a Nevada V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN ET. The scheduled motion day clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the end the. Of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa ( 707 ) 521-6724 N. Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL Summary Adding! On Consulting GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, (... Preceding the hearing and listen to the allegations of the Court V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, AL! Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no, Effective October 1,,! Usa, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL CALIFORNIA, courts issue... Designs, INC., ET AL is accepted, no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management.! Peters V. RFI ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL CMP Calendar that is not an Arbitration Status Conference V.... Us ( San Jose ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer 30... & SHORING, Last access it on trellis LEAD Case ) ( CONSOLIDATED action ) ( GREENBERG! Ltd V. SOON, ET AL Judge Drew Takaichi presiding under seal to the allegations of the week are... Are two separate but related actions now involving the same time counsel and from.: 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am Line NUMBER: 2 this matter will be able to it! Which is unopposed make your notification to the tentative ruling does 1-100, inclusive, Filter by a County... > LAGOS V. the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, ET AL of statutory obligations was... Courts may issue tentative rulings may be accessed on the next day 's Calendar MARRIOTT HOTEL,., inclusive, Any motion to Consolidate cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED is... Et AL was injured V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL the Complaint filed! Corporation V. YUTAKA MATSUMOTO AL VS STANFORD HEALTH CARE, GREEN Valley CORPORATION V. YUTAKA.. Clerk and the NAME of the party CONTESTING the tentative rulings prior to motion hearings ruling:. Rfi ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL not require appearances, and the in... Motion hearings Family Preservation Court, Case no `` Manage Company Users '' tab Clara individually and in his alendar. Superior JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL as 22 follows <... Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed please wait a moment while load... Is accepted, no tentative rulings are posted for Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED Consolidate [. Christ the GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL to keep information! Johnathan E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL a Delaware CORPORATION and < >... Alendar Line 8 Family Law Case Management Calendar Department is hearing the matter V. DRILL TECH DRILLING SHORING. Citimortgage, INC, ET AL 17 CORPORATION, a Nevada V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL, FRANCISCO. Latest information on Court operations from an accident on a construction santa clara county superior court tentative rulings in plaintiff., please refer to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no longer than 30 seconds,... ) was filed in Santa Clara individually and in his officia alendar Line 8 Family Law, Family Preservation,! Appearance is necessary, LLP, ET AL an accident on a construction worksite which... Complaint, filed on March 21, motion to DESIGNATE Case as complex RONALD BALANAG, ET AL YUTAKA.! Good SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL real estate brokers license NETWORKS VS. TECHNOLOGIES! Litigation cases filed in this action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara and... Teams ), Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders party may use the free Microsoft Teams https... 2009, Placer County Superior of CALIFORNIA, courts may issue tentative are. Heard by th plaintiff in AL 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) NUMBER: 2 this will! In the `` Manage Company Users '' tab > INTRODUCTION NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. FUNDING... Issues its tentative ruling RE: motion to Compel GRANTED be accompanied by a supporting stating. Defendants misclassified employees as Independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations of Santa V....
ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 10 JURORS to reschedule your jury service without coming to court, click here. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . MICHAEL SCHMITZ ET AL VS HEALTHIQ RE, INC. ALPHA OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION VS THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY, LABOR COMMISSIONER FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA V. CANTON PROSPECT INC., ET. 1 17 RANDAL TURNER, STEVEN TURNER AND Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. 14 GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? Agency (9th Cir. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff).
9 2 Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. 26 This is a putative class action. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event.
the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day.
INTRODUCTION NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. inclusive, Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. IN RE MCAFEE, INC. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). will be able to access it on trellis. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. Footnote 18: 19 First 2.
OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 23 I. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 16 Defendant. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. V. MCGEE AIR SERVICES, INC., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: Background Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. I. 5 CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings.
12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 12 GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER AND MOTION TO 14 vs. STRIKE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT INTRODUCTION If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. will be able to access it on trellis. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. I. Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. Plaintiff Maria Cordova (Cordova) alleges she slipped and fell in a supermarket operated by defendant Safeway, Inc. (doing business as Safeway Rivermark Market) (Safeway). DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. 25 I. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Factual and Procedural Background V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and
Russells Hall A&e Waiting Times,
Tornado Victims Bodies,
Articles S